< COVID-19

COVID-19/Efficacy of lockdown

This learning resource is about the efficacy of lockdowns. A lockdown has a massive impact on society and economy, unlike other epidemiological risk mitigation strategies like wearing mask and raising awareness of importance of protective measures (see Risk Literacy).

Review of Publication

The efficacy of lockdowns imposed by governments can be investigated. What can be investigated is the statistically measurable impact of lockdowns on relevant outcomes such as mortality rate.

Use the following resources with caution.

Further reading in mainstream media (use with double caution: mainstream media is generally unreliable on science):

  • Williams, Sophie (3 January 2020). "How the plague taught us to fight coronavirus". BBC News.
  • Levenson, Michael (2 January 2020). "Scale of China's Wuhan Shutdown Is Believed to Be Without Precedent". The New York Times.
  • Rogers, Adam (22 January 2020). "Would the Coronavirus Quarantine of Wuhan Even Work?". Wired.
  • Du, Lisa (24 January 2020). "China's Unproven Antiviral Solution: Quarantine of 40 Million". Bloomberg L.P.
  • "As Coronavirus Fears Intensify, Effectiveness of Quarantines Is Questioned". The New York Times. 2 January 2020.
  • Hamblin, James (2 January 2020). "A Historic Quarantine". The Atlantic.
  • Jain, Vageesh (31 January 2020). "Coronavirus outbreak: quarantining millions in China is unprecedented and wrong". The Conversation.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  • Did the COVID lockdowns work? Here’s what we know two years on, March 23, 2022, theconversation.com

Further reading for science, including pre-prints:

Further reading on media that neither scientific publication venue nor mainstream media, to be used with double caution:

Other further reading:

See also

This article is issued from Wikiversity. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.