Cauchy Integral Theorem

Introduction

The Cauchy integral theorem is one of the central results of Complex Analysis. It exists in various versions, and in this article, we aim to present a basic one for convex regions and a relatively general one for nullhomologous cycles.

For Convex Regions

Statement

Let be a convex region, and let be a closed rectifiable curve Trace of Curve in . Then, for every holomorphic function , the following holds:

Proof 1: Antiderivatives of f

First, we observe that has a antiderivative in . Fix a point . For any point , let denote the straight-line segment connecting and as path.

Proof 2: Definition of the Antiderivative

Define by:

.

Due to the convexity of , the triangle with vertices lies entirely within for .

Proof 3: Application of Goursat’s Lemma

By Goursat's Lemma for the boundary of a triangle with vertices , we have:

Proof 4: Conclusion Using Goursat's Lemma

This leads to:

Thus, we have:

Proof 5: Limit Process

Since is continuous in , taking the limit as gives:

Proof 5: Differentiability of

Therefore, is continuous, and is differentiable in , with:

Since was arbitrary, we conclude , proving that has a antiderivative.

Proof 6: Path Integration

Now, let be a piecewise continuously differentiable, closed curve. Then:

Proof 7:

Let be an arbitrary integration path in , and let . As shown here, we choose a polygonal path such that , , and

Since polygonal paths are piecewise continuously differentiable, the above result implies . Consequently,

As was arbitrary, the claim follows.

For Cycles in Arbitrary Open Sets

In arbitrary open sets, one must ensure that cycles do not enclose singularities or poles in the complement of the domain. Enclosing such singularities may contribute a non-zero value to the integral (e.g., the function and in a domain . Even though is holomorphic in , the integral is not zero but (see null-homologous Chain).

Statement

Let be open, and let be a null-homologous cycle in . Then, for every holomorphic function , the following holds:

Proof

Let , and define by

Then, is holomorphic, and by the global integral formula, we have:

See Also

Page Information

You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides

Wiki2Reveal

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.

Translation and Version Control

This page was translated based on the following Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity:

This article is issued from Wikiversity. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.