< Complex Analysis

Complex Analysis/Application of Cauchy-Riemann Equations

Statement

It is an area, holomorphic. If is constant to , then is constant.

Proof

It is open , holomorphic. Other constant.

Proof of Lemmas 1

If is constant to , then also must be constant with a constant . If is constant, the partial derivation and .

Proof of the Lemmas 2

Because of holomorphic on the Cauchy-Riemannschen equations apply to

and

Proof of the Lemmas 3

If and and application of the chain rule to the partial derivations are obtained the two equations

and

With CR-DGL and , the partial derivation of is replaced by partial derivations of and obtained (factor 2 can be omitted):

and

Proof of the Lemmas 4

We square the two equations

and add these two squared equations to:

Proof of the Lemmas 5

Clamping and gives:

This follows with the real-value component or Imaginary part functions in the product:

Proof of the Lemmas 6

  • and are real-valued and with the only option to fulfill the equation is i.e. and . This implies that is constant with .
  • Similar to the argument above implies for the partial derivatives and . With the application of the Cauchy-Riemann Equations and
for .

In both cases is constant on .

See also


Page Information

You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides

Wiki2Reveal

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Complex Analysis' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.

Translation and Version Control

This page was translated based on the following Wikiversity source page and uses the concept of Translation and Version Control for a transparent language fork in a Wikiversity:

This article is issued from Wikiversity. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.