< Evidence-based assessment < Vignettes

Evidence-based assessment/Vignettes/Jay

Click Here for Landing Page
Click Here for Landing Page
HGAPS Spring 2025: Mental Health and Resilience Resources for Squid Game
Click Here for Landing Page
Click Here for Landing Page

Squid Game 2 had 68 million viewers on its launch -- that is a lot of people who might benefit from resources organized by themes in each episode. Check out this resource built by a team supported in part by a WMF Rapid Grant after season 1!
~ More at HGAPS.org ~


Jay

Clinical description

Jay is a 22-year-old male undergraduate student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). Jay was previously diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). In college, Jay complained of having difficulties with sustaining attention, reading, inadequate study habits, and poor performance in his college courses (relative to his high school performance). He has been experiencing mood fluctuations. Jay has been feeling anxious for a long time. He says that he has "panic attacks" and "persistent worrying."

History of presenting a problem

Jay had previously been evaluated for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and was diagnosed. In addition to attention and reading difficulties, Jay reported clinically significant disordered mood and fluctuations in mood (i.e., periods of “highs” and “lows”), and a strong family history of bipolar disorder. Finally, Jay reported a longstanding history of anxiety, including panic attacks and persistent worrying.


Conceptualization


Initial treatment plan


Assessment Findings

Checklist Scores

Extended content


Select more specialized scales to refine probabilities

Updating probabilities

Critical items

Diagnostic Interview findings

Cognitive and Achievement Testing

(Not done as part of the evaluation; may be able to match up information later)

Prediction Phase

Let's see how we would apply the EBA principles to Arlene:

Shortlist of Probable Hypotheses

Based on Jay's age and the common clinical issues, here are the possible issues:

  • Attention problems
  • Anxiety disorders
  • Substance misuse should be another hypothesis, based again on its prevalence in his age group.
  • A mood disorder


Risk and Protective Factors and Moderators

Updating Probability of Diagnoses

Could add table with DLRS and revised probabilities, or leave them blank and have a "key" section?

Jay Common Dx Hypotheses (A) Starting Prob. (B) Broad Measure (D) Cross-informant (E) Confirmation (G) Treatment Phase (I), (J), (K)
Base Rate from Kessler et al. (2005) NCS-R Scale & Score DLR Revised Prob. EAY Check Next Test score DLR Revised Prob. MINI
Specific Phobia 0.13
PTSD 0.06
GAD 0.04 Generalized Anxiety Disorder Current
Panic Disorder 0.04 Panic Disorder Lifetime
Social Phobia 0.14
Separation Anxiety 0.02
Any Impulse Control Disorder ODD 0.10
CD 0.11
ADHD 0.08 Adult ADHD
Any Mood Disorder MDD 0.15 BDI Major Depressive Episode w/ Melancholic Features, Past
BP 0.06 MDQ KSADS Mania Scale? Hypomanic Episode
Dysthymia 0.02
Any Substance Abuse Disorder 0.17

Cross Informant Perspectives

Mention that these have DLRs. Also unpack the implications of agreement and disagreement for the client (and add a section about treatment implications of disagreement on the Conceptual Model Pages)

Prescription Phase

Mental Status and Clinical Observations

add content

Treatment Selection

Moderating Factors

Client Preferences

Process Phase

Clinically Significant Change

Reliable Change Index

Pick a treatment target and specify what the RCI would be for it. Discuss how you would explain to Arlene

Nomothetic Benchmarks

A, B, Cs of Jacobson definitions. General stuff about limitations would go on the main concept page. Here it is focused on the client -- what are the benchmarks they will focus on? How explained to them?

Interpreting benchmarks

Minimum Important Difference (MID)

Note that this section is a dangler -- not originally called out in the 12 steps. Medium d as a rule of thumb from Streiner, Norman, & Cairney (2015). Could work from AUC to d to raw units as a way of estimating, since psychology hasn't done research on this yet. Might be able to back into it with studies that had CSQ and outcome data.

Client Goals & Tracking

These would be personal goals and idiographic measurement -- YTOPS, etc.

Process Measures

This would be traces such as coming to sessions, doing homework assignments. (Not sure of other specifics involved in current IPT protocols?)

Progress Measures

YTOPS again and goal setting.

Termination Planning and Maintenance

Revisit Jacobson benchmarks. Is there much chance of relapse? What things would the client need to pay attention to if they were going to nip that in the bud?

  1. Merikangas, Kathleen Ries; He, Jian-ping; Burstein, Marcy; Swanson, Sonja A.; Avenevoli, Shelli; Cui, Lihong; Benjet, Corina; Georgiades, Katholiki et al.. "Lifetime Prevalence of Mental Disorders in U.S. Adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A)". Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 49 (10): 980–989. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017. PMID 20855043. PMC PMC2946114. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017.
This article is issued from Wikiversity. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.