I can understand needing a boot manager when you have seperate os on the same drive.
But what I have is 2 drives with Ubuntu on both, I wanted to boot them independent of each other, using the bios to set boot.
But thanks to GRUB, it jumps in and takes control making one drive the master and the other a slave to where if the master drive goes bad the slave is unbootable and useless?????
What I would like to do is get rid of GRUB completely, and use the BIOS to set boot. Is that possible?
Thanks!
UPDATE When I disconnect the drive GRUB has made the master and try and boot with the slave I get this,
error: no such device:
error: unknown filesystem.
Entering rescue mode...
grub rescue>
How can I fix that? I do not mean to make post sound like ranting and raving, it's just I am mad how GRUB screwed this up! Thanks for your help!
grub
do whatever you want; I have a system with 3 drives and I set it up as I want it; but I'd keepgrub
and have each system's own grub on it's own drive in your case (BIOS selecting which will boot, as is conventional). You didn't provide specifics as to your version; but to your specific question - Yes it's possible. – guiverc Jan 14 '20 at 02:15grub
allows you to boot using older kernels, ie. it's useful even if you only have a single OS installed. – guiverc Jan 14 '20 at 02:16