273

I've downloaded a game (Shank) but the bin file doesn't run. The error that is shown when I try to launch the executable is:

bash: ./shank-linux-120720110-1-bin: No such file or directory
Francesco
  • 2,961

9 Answers9

315

You're probably trying to run a 32-bit binary on a 64-bit system that doesn't have 32-bit support installed.

There are three cases where you can get the message “No such file or directory”:

  • The file doesn't exist. I presume you've checked that the file does exist (perhaps because the shell completes it).
  • There is a file by that name, but it's a dangling symbolic link.
  • The file exists, and you can even read it (for example, the command file shank-linux-120720110-1-bin displays something like “ELF 32-bit LSB executable …”), and yet when you try to execute it you're told that the file doesn't exist.

The error message in this last case is admittedly confusing. What it's telling you is that a key component of the runtime environment necessary to run the program is missing. Unfortunately, the channel through which the error is reported only has room for the error code and not for this extra information that it's really the runtime environment that's to blame. If you want the technical version of this explanation, read Getting “Not found” message when running a 32-bit binary on a 64-bit system.

The file command will tell you just what this binary is. With a few exceptions, you can only run a binary for the processor architecture that your release of Ubuntu is for. The main exception is that you can run 32-bit (x86, a.k.a. IA32) binaries on 64-bit (amd64, a.k.a. x86_64) systems.

In Ubuntu up to 11.04, to run a 32-bit binary on a 64-bit installation, you need to install the ia32-libs package Install ia32-libs. You may need to install additional libraries (you'll get an explicit error message if you do).

Since 11.10 (oneiric) introduced multiarch support, you can still install ia32-libs, but you can choose a finer-grained approach, it's enough to get libc6-i386 Install libc6-i386 (plus any other necessary library).

  • Thanks for a great answer, Gilles. While I haven't experienced this problem (yet!), I have filed your answer away for future reference. – Jim C May 07 '12 at 21:56
  • Thank you for your exhaustive answer! The file bin I've downloaded was the only one available in this format(bin). So i think is good for all architectures. I've also downloaded the .deb file for my architecture (64bit) but with different error. At this point I think that the game is affected by some bugs or I don't be able to install this game. Now I try to download libc6-i386 and I still try to install it. I will write again if there are significant changes. Thank you for you time. – Francesco May 07 '12 at 22:08
  • I've found the solution! It's too long to write, but if anyone needs it I'm ready to help. – Francesco May 09 '12 at 17:34
  • 4
    @Francesco Please do post the solution! It is likely to help other people trying to run Shank on Ubuntu. It's perfectly ok to answer your own question. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' May 09 '12 at 18:19
  • 1
    You can use ldd to check if you're missing a library. ldd kgio_ext.so might say something like libruby.so.2.3 => not found among others – EnabrenTane Feb 03 '16 at 22:45
  • 1
    There's apparently another scenario when bash: ...some...path...: No such file or directory can show up: after moving the executable file. Bash seems to cache paths to executables found in $PATH; run hash -r to clear it. See: http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/5610/11352 – akavel Dec 12 '16 at 11:25
  • @akavel This question was about a scenario when the file exists. There are of course plenty of scenarios where you'll get an error message stating that a file doesn't exist and the file really does not exist. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Dec 12 '16 at 12:15
  • @Gilles Hm; for me the case was that the file existed but at a different path (and still in $PATH). But then I agree this is arguable. – akavel Dec 12 '16 at 12:34
  • This is an error from the dark side of mordor!! Very difficult to debug – guilhermecgs Apr 23 '19 at 20:06
  • I have the same problem with an executable but there are no 32-bit things involved. And ldd returns a match for everything. Curious if you know other reasons the executable might emit "No such file or directory." even when ldd returns a full list of resolved 64-bit libraries. – Scott Smith Aug 02 '23 at 21:08
  • @ScottSmith Likely some variant of https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/76490/no-such-file-or-directory-on-an-executable-yet-file-exists-and-ldd-reports-al/76514#76514 – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Aug 03 '23 at 07:00
76

64 bit Ubuntu Multiarch systems

Follow this answer only if the output of file file-name shows,

file-name: ELF 32-bit LSB  executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, not stripped

To run 32bit executable file in a 64 bit multi-arch Ubuntu system, you have to add i386 architecture and also you have to install libc6:i386,libncurses5:i386,libstdc++6:i386 these three library packages.

sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install libc6:i386 libncurses5:i386 libstdc++6:i386
./file-name
Avinash Raj
  • 78,556
  • I would use sudo for the last command : launching a 32bit binary (so obviously not compiled by you or Ubuntu) as sudo could be risky. (well, even as non root, admitedly) – alci May 07 '14 at 16:58
  • what ever it may be at the last but it works. – Avinash Raj May 07 '14 at 17:01
  • 1
    Is should be noted that if you are using CentOS or RedHat, this answer does not apply. Was thrown off for a few hours because of this. – omikes Feb 28 '17 at 23:26
  • 1
    On Kali 2 64 bit, I only had to install libselinux1:i386 – Aralox Mar 19 '17 at 10:57
  • FWIW, this worked like a charm for me on Raspberry Pi OS 64-bit (Debian Buster derived), substituting "armhf" for "i386". Thanks! – Ivan X Aug 21 '23 at 04:43
27

To expand on @Gilles answer, there are at least three scenarios resulting in this error:

  1. The file doesn't exist.
  2. The file exists but is a dangling symbolic link.
  3. The file exists (e.g. file command works), making for a puzzling error message. This may mean there's a problem with the loader.

Categories of loader problems:

  1. An executable's loader does not exist. You can check this using the file command and see if the loader does exist. E.g.

    file lmgrd
    lmgrd: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3, for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped
    

    Notice interpreter /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3; if this file does not exist, you need to install it. For this particular loader on 16.04, the answer turned out to be sudo apt-get install lsb.

  2. Issues with a script's loader (see this answer).

  3. Missing shared libraries -- use ldd <file-name> to check for any "not found" libraries. See this answer for more info.

The loader not existing could be due to a 32/64 bit mismatch or some other reason. There might be other kinds of loader errors I don't know about.

jtpereyda
  • 2,065
6

Here's a transcript showing a bit more about the nature of the problem, and how to fix it as of Ubuntu 16.04. Notice that even though file reports "dynamically linked", ldd reports "not a dynamic executable".

$ ./myprogram
bash: myprogram: No such file or directory

$ file myprogram
myprogram: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, not stripped

$ ldd myprogram
    not a dynamic executable

Once you install libc6:i386, things start improving...

$ sudo apt-get install libc6:i386 # the initial fix
...

$ ldd myprogram
    linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xf77fd000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0xf7626000)
    /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x56578000)

$ ./myprogram
myprogram: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

To complete the job, you may need to identify and install additional libraries one at a time...

$ sudo apt-get install libstdc++6:i386 ## may require various additional libs

$ ./myprogram
... works correctly ...

I don't know if there is a systematic way of identifying the correct libraries to install. There is a bit of guesswork mapping the error messages to package names (tab completion helps).

4

By installing the deb for 32 bit I realized I was missing some libraries (in addition to ia32-libs and libc6). I first solved this problem by giving this command:

sudo apt-get install -f          

Then I got another error:

Message: SDL_GL_LoadLibrary 
Error: Failed loading libGL.so.1

Obviously, these libraries were properly installed. Without going into details I had to link the libraries by hand. I realized then that could also an easier solution through Synaptic install the following packages:

libgl1-mesa-glx:i386
libgl1-mesa-dri: i386.

After that the next problem was the black screen while playing, which I solved by replacing the executable in /Shank/bin with this: http://treefort.icculus.org/smb/smb-linux-mesa-hotfix-test.tar.bz2.

I hope it will be useful to someone. If you need more help or more details please feel free to contact me.

kiri
  • 28,246
  • 16
  • 81
  • 118
Francesco
  • 2,961
2

This error happens when working on Windows (which introduces extra characters because of different line separator than Linux system) and trying to run this script (with extra characters inserted) in Linux. The error message is misleading.

In Windows, the line separator is CRLF (\r\n) whereas in linux it is LF (\n). In my case, this happened due to working on Windows and uploading to Unix server for execution.

PALEN
  • 1,101
  • 1
    Tip: In VSCode in the bottom right corner you can change the line terminator frin "CRLF" to "LF". – Avatar Mar 24 '20 at 15:45
  • 1
    Thank you. You are a life saver man.

    I don't know how is anyone supposed to pick that up from this error message. I have been struggling for days. Then I opened up VS code as you suggested, opened the run.sh file and changed the line endings to LF instead of CRLF. Then I reran the dotnet build and the docker build and the docker run and everything worked, finally!!!!! Thank you.

    I think in my case I was shielded from this problem when deploying to the external environments because git changes the line endings to LF when we commit, and then back to CRLF when we check out to windows.

    – Martin Lottering Sep 29 '22 at 14:35
1

Google navigated me to this page. My issue was distantly related to the title of this thread, so I am posting it here for the future visitors like me:

It is one of the weirdest issues:

$ ls -lh
ls: cannot access .~dataprep.ipynb: No such file or directory
-????????? ? ?      ?           ?            ? .~dataprep.ipynb
-rw------- 1 tgowda mygroup 475K Jun 12 15:59 dataprep.ipynb

I see that the file .~dataprep.ipynb is right there with some weird ?? permissions. I just wanted to get rid of that messed up file. rm command could not remove it. mv command couldn't move it.

And then...

$ python
>>> from pathlib import Path
>>> list(Path('.').glob("*.ipynb"))
[PosixPath('.~dataprep.ipynb'), PosixPath('dataprep.ipynb')]
>>> p = list(Path('.').glob("*.ipynb"))[0]
>>> p
PosixPath('.~dataprep.ipynb')
>>> p.unlink()
>>> list(Path('.').glob("*.ipynb"))
[PosixPath('dataprep.ipynb')]

And that's how I was able to defeat it.

Thamme Gowda
  • 583
  • 4
  • 7
1

As posted in https://askubuntu.com/a/1035037/676490

sudo apt-get install lsb

solved the problem

JoKalliauer
  • 1,575
  • 2
  • 17
  • 26
0

None of the above answers worked for me because there was a miss-resolving for the interpreter.

I have written a detailed answer here, explaining how to fix this issue.

Thanks to this man who shared his experience with others solution here. thanks to him i was able to solve this problem.

To summarize, as @steeldriver though, there was an interpreter problem. the linker is giving to my program [/lib/ld64.so.1] as ELF interpreter but this path doesnt exist at all and i checked it by:

> ls /lib/ld64.so.1
ls: cannot access '/lib/ld64.so.1': No such file or directory

After that, i checked the interpreters path's on my ubuntu installation by:

> ls /lib64/ld-*
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2  /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.2  /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3

so the solution is to create a link of one of this interpreters to the inexistant interpreter path by:

sudo ln -s /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib/ld64.so.1

Now we re-check the inexistent interpreter one more time to see if its still inexisting or not:

> ls /lib/ld64.so.1
/lib/ld64.so.1

Now this command has returned /lib/ld64.so.1 instead of "inexistant file". so the problem was solved and i could run ./main successfully

So, in a summary, you have to create a link of one of this interpreters to the inexistant interpreter path by running the following command in a terminal (Ctrl + Alt + T) :

sudo ln -s /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib/ld64.so.1
  • While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - From Review – Error404 Jan 29 '22 at 09:00
  • done, i hope that you remove that delete vote – Mohamed Elleuch Jan 29 '22 at 23:49
  • Thanks for editing your answer, I have further edited it to improve the formatting and grammar. Don't worry about the delete vote, it would be automatically retracted soon! – Error404 Jan 30 '22 at 06:38