How to use glibc 2.33 when I already have glibc2.31

Asked Oct 29 '22 at 12:05

Active Oct 29 '22 at 12:05

Viewed 3,106 times

To install WRF-ARW, I faced an issue with glibc. Like when I tried

gfortran TEST_1_fortran_only_fixed.f && ./a.out

I got the following error:

/usr/bin/ld: /home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Cellar/gcc@11/11.3.0/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Cellar/gcc@11/11.3.0/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11/liblto_plugin.so)
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

I have GLIBC 2.31,

ldd (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.31-0ubuntu9.9) 2.31
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty, not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper.

When I searched to update the lib, I got the warning alert from everywhere saying,

The libraries shipped by glibc have a lot of reverse dependencies, and an upgrade would probably trigger a need to rebuild quite a few other packages.

Then what is the best possible solution to fix this issue? Any help will be appreciated. TIA

asked Oct 29 '22 at 12:05

falamiw

In fact, if I install it separately like this, then how to integrate it with my gcc@11? – falamiw Oct 29 '22 at 12:07
What version of Ubuntu are you using? – David Oct 29 '22 at 12:28
Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS @David – falamiw Oct 29 '22 at 12:31
1

You may want to investigate if 22.04 has the support you need. – David Oct 29 '22 at 12:32
It seems Ubuntu 22.4 have glibc (2.35-0ubuntu3.1). Should I upgrade? Is it possible to face the issue then? @David – falamiw Oct 29 '22 at 12:37
I think you mean 22.04 and it would seem to me that is the way to go. Check and see if the program you want to install can use 2.35 – David Oct 29 '22 at 12:47
Is there any similar way to switch glibc like GCC? – falamiw Oct 29 '22 at 17:07

How to use glibc 2.33 when I already have glibc2.31

0 Answers0