19

What is the purpose of using #!/usr/bin/env <sh|bash|python> shebang compared to #!/bin/bash, #!/bin/sh or #!/usr/bin/python?

Flimm
  • 41,766
Tuminoid
  • 3,952

2 Answers2

11

Some people might use a different python (perl, etc.) than the system one. /usr/bin/env python would run the version configured as the current one, possibly making the script more portable.

On the other hand, reportedly, some systems do not have /usr/bin/env. Also, you cannot use #!/usr/bin/env foo x as a replacement for #!foo x, because foo x will be interpreted as a single argument. So the value of the approach is debatable.

choroba
  • 9,643
  • 1
    Configured where? From info coreutils 'env invocation' I can see this form of calling makes sure it is external binary instead of shell built-in, but no indication how env python would be any different from python? – Tuminoid Jan 24 '13 at 09:15
  • 4
    Your PATH probably includes /usr/local/bin first. If somebody has manually installed python there, then env will call it, whereas #!/usr/bin/python will bypass it. – Robie Basak Jan 24 '13 at 09:44
  • 2
    virtualenv is a quite popular tool, and it installs a python executable in the working directory. You would need the env trick to get it to work correctly. – Flimm Jan 29 '13 at 21:38
  • 2
    @Tuminoid: you are right: env python is the same as python. However the problem is that you can't write a shebang like #!python: you need to specify a full path. – Andrea Corbellini Jan 29 '13 at 22:36
0
#!/usr/bin/env python
#!/usr/bin/python

The first one is more portable. source1. source2. source3. I haven't seen Linux a system where it doesn't work. And this is a general statement - /usr/bin/env is often available, other binaries sit around the filesystem wherever they please.

Vorac
  • 319
  • 4
  • 17