1

I am trying to use webex in Ubuntu 14.10.

I followed another question on this topic. How to I make Cisco WebEx work with 13.10 64bit?.

I need to install libjawt.so dependency in my system.

I tried apt-file search libjawt.so which shows many possible libraries with libjawt.so.

gcc-snapshot: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcj-5.0.0-15/libjawt.so
gcc-snapshot: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-5.0-snap-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
gcj-4.8-jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.8-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
gcj-4.9-jre: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
libgcj14-awt: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.8-amd64/lib/libjawt.so
libgcj14-awt: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcj-4.8-14/libjawt.so
libgcj14-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcj-4.8-14/libjawt.so
libgcj15-awt: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64/lib/libjawt.so
libgcj15-awt: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcj-4.9-15/libjawt.so
libgcj15-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gcj-4.9-15/libjawt.so
openjdk-6-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
openjdk-6-jre-headless: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
openjdk-7-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
openjdk-7-jre-headless: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
openjdk-8-jdk: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/lib/amd64/libjawt.so
openjdk-8-jre-headless: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjawt.so

I tried installing gcc-snapshot:i386 causing dependency broken in my system.

I have also tried installing other dependencies but still not working.

Community
  • 1
TheKojuEffect
  • 3,465

1 Answers1

-1

http://pedroalves-bi.blogspot.com/2014/05/setting-up-webex-on-ubuntu-1404-64-bits.html says that libjawt.so really is not required for webex to be running successfully and I can confirm that as for my Debian 8 host.

I was not able to discover a package which would install the file on place where it would be discovered by dynamic linker.

I've tried to create a symlink, but that's a hack and as we can see is not really required.

Oleksii Zagorskyi
  • 1