1

I see to upgrade Ubuntu to a new release version that I have to do do-release-upgrade which checks for the new version and allows me to upgrade. But would it not be better to do sudo do-release-upgrade? Would there be any difference in the outcome if you ran it with sudo rather than without, and would this outcome, if at all different, be any better?

  • 1
    http://askubuntu.com/questions/360356/why-doesnt-the-command-do-release-upgrade-doesnt-require-sudo ;) – Rinzwind Jan 19 '15 at 18:00
  • 1
    The answer to your specific question is: no, there's no reason running sudo do-release-upgrade is any better (or neccessarily worse) than just do-release-upgrade. – Oli Jan 19 '15 at 18:04

0 Answers0