P-convex hull

Introduction

For -norms are a generalization of norms. The definition requires the notion of (absolute) -convex hull (see Köthe 1966[1]).

Definition: p-convex

Let be a subset of a vector space and , then is called -convex if fulfills the following property:

Definition: absolute p-convex

Let be a subset of a vector space and , then is said to be absolutely -convex if fulfills the following property:

Definition: p-convex hull

The -convex hull of the set (label: ) is the intersection over all -convex sets containing .

Definition: absolute p-convex hull

The absolutely -convex hull of the set (label: ) is the section over all absolutely -convex sets containing .

Lemma: Display of the absolutely p-convex hull

Let be a subset of a vector space over the body and , then the absolute -convex hull of can be written as follows:

Proof

3 subassertions are shown, where (1) and (2) gives and (3) gives the subset relation .

  • (Proof part 1) ,
  • (Proof part 2) is absolutely -convex and.
  • (Proof part 3) is contained in any absolutely -convex set .


Proof part 1

, because

Proof part 2

Now let and be given. One must show that .

Proof Part 2.1 - Absolute p-convex

Let now have the following representations:

  • with
  • with .

Now we have to show that the absolute -convex combination is an element of , i.e.


proof-part-2.2-absolutely-p-convex

is absolutely -convex, because it holds with :

This gives:

Proof Part 2.3 - Zero Vector

, because it holds with and any gets .

Proof part 3

We now show that the absolutely -convex hull is contained in every absolutely -convex superset of .

Proof Part 3.1 - Induction over Number of Summands

Now let us show inductively via the number of summands that every element of the form

in a given absolutely -convex set is contained.

Proof Part 3.2 - Induction Start

For , the assertion follows via the definition of an absolutely -convex set .

Proof Part 3.3 - Induction Precondition

Now let the condition for hold, i.e.:

Proof Part 3.4 - Induction Step

For , the assertion follows as follows:

Let and with for all . is now to be proved.

Proof Part 3.5 - Induction Step

If , then there is nothing to show, since then all are for .

Proof Part 3.6 - Constructing a p-convex combination of n summands

We now construct a sum of non-negative summands

Proof part 3.7 - Application of the induction assumption

So let . The inequality

Returns after induction assumption .


Proof Part 3.8 - Induction Step

Since is absolutely -convex, it follows with

Proof 4

From the proof parts , and together the assertion follows.

Lemma: p-convex hull

Let be a subset of a vector space over the body and , then the -convex hull of can be written as follows:

Proof: task for learners

Transfer the above proof analogously to the -convex hull.


See also

References

  1. Gottfried Köthe (1966) Topological Vector Spaces, 15.10, pp.159-162.

Page Information

You can display this page as Wiki2Reveal slides

Wiki2Reveal

The Wiki2Reveal slides were created for the Inverse-producing extensions of Topological Algebras' and the Link for the Wiki2Reveal Slides was created with the link generator.

This article is issued from Wikiversity. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.